MAK | RESULTS

The following cases are just a small sampling of the many successful results our lawyers have achieved for clients over the years:

$12 Million - Class action settlement in a Los Angeles County, California case in which MAK represents a nationwide class of consumers for false advertising against the manufacturer of a popular penis enlargement product.

$2,600,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Lincoln, California.

$1,310,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Brentwood, California.

$1,011,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Chula Vista, California.

$900,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Thousand Oaks, California.

$841,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Temecula, California.

$775,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Bakersfield, California.

$706,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Rocklin, California.

$685,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Folsom, California.

$658,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Coto de Caza, California.

$645,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Temecula, California.

Class Certification GRANTED in a Los Angeles County, California case in which MAK represents a nationwide class of consumers for false advertising against the manufacturer of a popular penis enlargement product. The trial court certified a nationwide class in a contested proceeding and also agreed to shift all the costs of notice to the defendants.

Final Approval GRANTED in a Los Angeles County, California case in which MAK, as lead counsel, represents a nationwide class of consumers against the manufacturer of a popular cosmetic lotion, for false advertising in the labeling and sales of its products.

Preliminary Approval GRANTED in a Los Angeles County, California case in which MAK is among lead counsel in a nationwide class action against the manufacturer of a popular anti-anxiety medication. Class notice will now commence.

In a first-of-its-kind Motion for Summary Judgment in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, MAK helped secure the invalidation of all potential exclusions upon which Audubon Insurance Company was relying in denying coverage to its insured homeowners in a Chinese drywall bad faith case. The ruling will now allow homeowners in Louisiana and perhaps around the country to begin remediation of their homes from the toxic effects of Chinese drywall.

Class certification GRANTED in a riverside County, California case in which MAK, as lead counsel, represents California homeowners in a products liability class action against the manufacturer of their aluminum windows.

Final Approval GRANTED in a San Joaquin County, California case in which MAK, as co-lead counsel, represents California homeowners in a products liability class action against the manufacturer of their aluminum windows.

Final Approval GRANTED in a Los Angeles County, California case in which MAK, as lead counsel, represents a nationwide class of consumers against the manufacturer of a well-known diet soft drink, for false advertising in the labeling and sales of its products.

Final Approval GRANTED in a Los Angeles County, California case in which MAK, as lead counsel, represents a nationwide class of consumers against the manufacturer of a popular illness remedy, for false advertising in the labeling and sales of its products.

Class action settlement in a Los Angeles County, California case in which MAK represents employees of a major beverage distributor for Labor Code violations and the failure to pay overtime wages.

Class action settlement in a Los Angeles County, California case in which MAK represents a nationwide class of consumers against the manufacturer of a diet supplement, for false advertising in the labeling and sales of its products.

$2,782,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Menifee.

$1,234,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Camarillo.

$851,697 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Corona.

$844,625 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Pittsburg.

$784,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Salida.

$955,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in San Marcos.

$603,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Lake Elsinore.

$985,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Sacramento.

$2,185,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Bakersfield, California.

$1,985,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in San Diego, California.

$1,448,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Chula Vista, California.

$1,431,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Mather, California.

$1,452,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Salinas, California.

$1,189,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in La Habra, California.

$986,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Arvin, California.

$915,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Chula Vista, California.

$855,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Tracy, California.

$825,000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Oxnard, California.

$3, 150, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in San Jose, California.

$993, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Castaic, California.

$1,988, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Sacramento, California.

$983, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Antelope, California.

$979, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Chula Vista, California.

$972, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Saugus, California.

$1,362, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Moreno Valley, California.

$961, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Fontana, California.

$910, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Bakersfield, California.

$810, 000 - Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Chula Vista, California.

$7,210,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Sacramento, California.

$5,500,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Rowland Heights, California.  

$5,300,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Temecula, California.

$4,100,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Fairfield, California.  

$3,900,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Antioch, California.

$3,500,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Elk Grove, California.

$2,200,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Tracy, California.  

$2,200,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Oceanside, California.  

$2,100,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Fontana, California.

$1,950,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Patterson, California.  

$1,900,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Bakersfield, California.

$1,900,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Camarillo, California.

$1,820,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Vacaville, California.  

$1,690,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Livermore, California.

$24,000,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Newhall, California.

Class action settlement on behalf of California automobile insurance policyholders alleging unlawful price-fixing of insurance premiums by prominent national insurance company.

$8,300,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Corona, California.

Class action settlement on behalf of purchasers of popular dietary supplement alleging false and misleading advertising in that the product's label claims were unsubstantiated by laboratory testing.

$8,200,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Anaheim Hills, California.

Class action settlement on behalf of California homeowners whose homes were constructed with defective windows designed and manufactured by one of the country's largest window manufacturers.

$6,121,950 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Victorville, California.

Class action settlement on behalf of major beverage distributor employees alleging employment misclassification and failure to pay overtime wages and benefits.

Class action settlement on behalf of major clothing retail chain employees alleging employment misclassification and failure to pay overtime wages and benefits.

$4,740,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Rialto, California.

Class action settlement on behalf of California consumers against major petroleum manufacturer for alleging unlawful fees and surcharges in connection with the purchase of automobile fuel.

$4,600,000 - complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Chino Hills, California.

Bad faith claim on behalf of individual client against major insurance company alleging breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing

Class action settlement on behalf of a nationwide class of consumers against soft drink manufacturer for false advertising in the selling and labeling of their products.

Class action settlement on behalf of California consumers challenging food company’s advertising practices.

$1,077,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Sacramento. 

$977,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Chula Vista.

$963,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners Fontana. 

$928,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in San Diego.

$867,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners Brentwood.

$850,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Simi Valley.

$757,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Sacramento.

$730,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Santa Maria.

$714,000Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Murrieta.

$710,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Wildomar.

$709,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Fontana.

$708,000 Complex multi-party construction defect litigation on behalf of residential homeowners in Rocklin.